Skip to main content
LLM and AI agent integration

Connecting language models to the software that runs your business

Integration is where artificial intelligence projects succeed or quietly fail. We connect platforms such as Claude and DeepSeek to your database, your documents and your rules, with the limits, logging and human oversight that make the result something you can depend on rather than something you have to supervise.

The engineering that surrounds a model

Calling a language model is a few lines of code. Everything that makes the call worth making is the part around it. Which information should be retrieved and sent. How to structure the request so the response is usable by software rather than only readable by a person. What to do when the service is slow, rate limited or briefly unavailable. How to keep costs predictable when volume grows. What gets recorded so that an output can be examined later.

We have been building that layer into production applications for several years. It is ordinary software engineering rather than anything exotic, and it is precisely what separates a feature that survives contact with real users from a prototype that impressed everybody in a meeting and was switched off two months later.

Retrieval, so answers come from your information

Most useful integrations depend on retrieval. Your documents and records are indexed so that, when a request arrives, the system finds the genuinely relevant material and includes it in the request to the model. The answer is then based on your information rather than on whatever the model absorbed from the internet during training.

Doing this well involves decisions that materially affect quality, including how documents are divided, how relevance is judged, how much context is worth including given the cost, and how to handle material that has been superseded. We also keep the source of every answer available, because a response that cannot be verified is difficult to act on with confidence.

Agents that carry out defined tasks

An agent is a model given the ability to take actions rather than only produce text, such as looking up a record, creating a draft, scheduling something or calling another service. Used carefully this is genuinely powerful. Used carelessly it is how automated systems do embarrassing things at scale.

Our approach is deliberately conservative. Each agent gets a specific, bounded task rather than general permission to act. The operations it may perform are enumerated explicitly, and anything irreversible or financially significant requires human confirmation. Every action is logged with what triggered it. Limits prevent runaway loops. The result is automation you can audit, which is the only kind most businesses should deploy.

Reliability, cost and privacy in production

Production integrations need engineering for the ordinary problems. External services occasionally slow down or return errors, so requests retry sensibly and the application degrades gracefully rather than showing users a broken page. Heavy work runs through Celery so nobody waits on a page for a model to finish. Responses that repeat get cached, which reduces both latency and cost.

On privacy, we are explicit with you about what data leaves your systems, which provider receives it and under what terms, and we design to send the minimum required rather than everything available. Where obligations are strict, that constraint shapes the architecture from the beginning, and we will tell you honestly when a requirement means a particular AI feature should not be built at all.

Integration work

  • Connecting models to your existing application
  • Document indexing and retrieval
  • Structured output that software can use
  • Agents with enumerated, bounded actions
  • Human confirmation for significant steps
  • Retries, timeouts and graceful failure
  • Background processing through Celery
  • Caching and cost control
  • Full logging for review and audit

Platforms and tools

ClaudeDeepSeekPython DjangoCeleryRedis REST APIs

Integration questions

It depends on the task, the cost tolerance and any data handling requirements you carry. We build the integration so the provider is a choice rather than a permanent commitment, which matters in a field where capability and pricing change several times a year. Being able to move is worth more than picking a supposed winner today.

It is possible and occasionally the right answer where data cannot leave your infrastructure. It brings real costs in hardware, operation and capability compared with hosted services. We will lay out the trade off honestly rather than assuming either option, because for most businesses the hosted route is considerably more practical.

By limiting what it can do rather than trusting it to behave. Actions are enumerated explicitly, permissions are enforced by the same system that governs human users, anything irreversible requires confirmation, loops are capped, and everything is logged. Safety comes from architecture, not from instructions in a prompt.

We keep the integration behind an internal boundary so the rest of your application does not depend on any provider specifics. Switching then means changing one component rather than rewriting a feature. Given how quickly this field moves, that separation is one of the more valuable design decisions available.

Have an AI idea that needs to survive production?

Tell us what you want it to do and where your data lives. We will describe what a dependable version would take to build.